Foundations to Congress: Tamper With Charitable Deduction and Communities Lose

BMCF joins Council on Foundations, Grantmaker's Forum and Alliance for Charitable Reform in DC

Sector Leaders Tell Lawmakers Limits, Caps Not a Solution to Fiscal Crisis  

 WASHINGTON, D.C. – Millions of people throughout America are at risk of losing crucial nonprofit services if Congress enacts limits to the century-old charitable tax deduction. Hundreds of foundation and philanthropic leaders are in Washington, D.C. this week to make sure lawmakers understand that unraveling the charitable deduction is not a solution to the budget crisis.

The timing is key as Congress and the president tackle deficit reduction and tax reform. The House and Senate both released their budget plans last week and the proposed Senate budget suggests limits to itemized deductions – one of which is the charitable deduction – putting at risk billions of dollars in charitable donations.

“The charitable deduction is unlike anything else in our tax code, encouraging people to invest in their communities without personal gain,” said Kevin Murphy, president of the Berks County Community Foundation in Pennsylvania and board chair of the Council on Foundations. “Limiting the charitable deduction would have the greatest impact on those who need the most help, especially during tough economic times. How could we possibly limit or tamper with incentives that allow people to give away their income to benefit others?”

Foundations on the Hill is an annual event sponsored by the Council on Foundations, the Alliance for Charitable Reform and the Forum of Regional Associations of Grantmakers. It brings together hundreds of leaders from community organizations to make sure elected officials clearly understand the inextricable link between charitable giving and thriving communities – from jobs and economic growth to spurring innovation and improving education and health to crisis relief, human services and more.

Gloria Johnson Cusack, executive director of Leadership 18, an alliance of CEOs leading America’s largest nonprofits, said, “I don’t believe any policymaker intends to undermine charities. But the fact is that major decisions about a range of issues are going to be made very quickly behind closed doors in this unusual legislative environment. That’s why we have to act now to make sure lawmakers understand that giving will go down significantly if they change good, existing policy that incentivizes people to support communities. We know policymakers face tough decisions, but now is not the time to experiment with the charitable deduction. The burden falls on nonprofit organizations and the people they serve.”

Michael Litz, president and CEO of the Forum of Regional Associations of Grantmakers, said, “Philanthropy is an independent, innovative investment for improving our communities and it needs to be preserved, recognized as different, and encouraged, now more than ever. It is critical that we educate members of Congress about how philanthropic innovation tackles society’s greatest challenges and benefits their constituents – by educating children, improving lives, revitalizing neighborhoods and strengthening communities.”

Lawson Knight, executive director of the Blue Mountain Community Foundation Washington state, said, “Giving to others sustains positive change where I live. In our area, charitable giving resurrected a local theater, renewed a downtown, built parks, provided swimming lessons for children and scholarships for aspiring college graduates. Giving is not simply a luxury afforded to those taking a charitable deduction. It is central to the American experience. It is essential that it remain so.”

“When it comes to who benefits from the charitable deduction, we think of people in need, not donors who take a deduction,” said Peter Bird, president of the Frist Foundation in Nashville, Tennessee. “Those who benefit from our grants range from families seeking health care and job opportunities to Alzheimer’s patients and their loved ones. When you think about revenue, tax reform, deductions and exclusions, think about how all of that would impact the way we care for each other.”

###

The Council on Foundations, formed in 1949, is a nonprofit membership association of grantmaking foundations and corporations. Members of the Council include more than 1,700 independent, operating, community, public and company-sponsored foundations, and corporate giving programs in the United States and abroad. The Council’s mission is to provide the opportunity, leadership, and tools needed by philanthropic organizations to expand, enhance, and sustain their ability to advance the common good. www.cof.org

The Alliance for Charitable Reform (ACR) works to advance the principles that promote vigorous private giving to charities and to preserve the rights of these donors. A project of The Philanthropy Roundtable, ACR educates legislators and policymakers about the central role of private giving in American life and thus the importance of protecting philanthropic freedom—the ability of individuals and private organizations to determine how and where to direct their charitable assets. ACR seeks to prevent policies that would diminish private giving, limit the diversity of charitable causes Americans support, or place undue government regulations on philanthropic organizations at both the federal and state level. www.acreform.com

The Forum of Regional Associations of Grantmakers (the Forum) is the national philanthropic federation and network of 34 regional associations of grantmakers serving nearly 5500 grantmaking entities and funder collaboratives. The mission of the Forum network is to connect and support regional associations — in ways that expand their capacity to lead, add value to their members, and strengthen philanthropy in their regions — and to bring the knowledge and experience of the regional associations into the national conversation on philanthropy. www.givingforum.org

A Fresh Look at Giving in the Blue Mountain Area

A fascinating new look at giving has been released by the Chronicle of Philanthropy, called How America Gives.  It looks at “exact dollar amounts released by the Internal Revenue Service showing the value of charitable deductions claimed by American taxpayers.” Data comes from 2008 IRS tax information.  Here is a look at Washington, and Walla Walla County in particular.

How does Walla Wallla stack up compared to the the state and nation?  Amazingly and generously well!  The following table compares Walla Walla County to the state and Country:

United States Washington Walla Walla County
Total Contributions $135.8 B $3 B $22.1 M
Median Contribution $2,564 $2,319 $3,610
Median Discretionary Income $54,783 $56,282 $45,311
Percent of Income Given 4.7% 4.1% 8.0%

Walla Walla gives at rates nearly double the state average.  Its median contribution exceeds the national median by 40% at the same time discretionary income is 17% less than the national median.

It has been a feeling that the Blue Mountain area is a generous place.  Here is the data to back it up.

Total Contributions

The map in blue shows total giving by county with the balloon detailing Walla Walla County.  The darker the color, the more giving.

Median Discretionary Income

The orange map depicts median discretionary income in Washington.  Again, the darker the image, the higher the median income.  Walla Walla County detail is shown in the balloon.  Discretionary income is a bit complicated.

For this study, The Chronicle started with adjusted gross income and subtracted federal income tax (less tax credits), Social Security and Medicare taxes, and state and local taxes.  Also removed were median housing costs for home­owners and renters in each ZIP code as well as average living expenses from information collected by the Bureau of Labor Statistics and available by metropolitan area and region. The Chronicle applied those figures to ZIP codes that fall in the areas designated by the bureau.

Median Contribution

The green map shows the median contribution in Washington.  Put differently, it shows how much the middle person from the group of tax returns actually gave to charity.  The darker the image, the higher the contribution level.  Walla Walla County detailed is shown in the balloon.

Percent of Income Given

The final map shows the percentage of income given by households, by county.

All data and maps courtesy of How America Gives from The Chronicle of Philanthropy.

Garfield County, PSE and WDFW break ground on Habitat Fund

A $165,500 fund to protect wildlife habitat in Garfield County has been created under an agreement between Puget Sound Energy, Garfield County and the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife.  The endowment, administered by Blue Mountain Community Foundation, is called the Puget Sound Energy Lower Snake River Wind Habitat Project Fund.

Establishment of a long-term fund to preserve and enhance wildlife habitat is the brainchild of Grant Morgan, public works director for Garfield County. Morgan saw the fund as an opportunity to create an enduring asset for Garfield County – not unlike PSE’s new Lower Snake River Wind Facility.  Anne Walsh, PSE’s senior environmental and communications manager in Southeast Washington, suggested that Blue Mountain Community Foundation manage the fund.  The 2009 WDFW Wind Power Guidelines provided the framework to develop the mitigation strategy that ultimately resulted in the Puget Sound Energy Lower Snake River Wind Habitat Project Fund.

“By using mitigation funds from PSE’s Lower Snake River facility for an endowment,” Walsh said, “we can support environmental projects over the life of the wind project and beyond.”

The habitat endowment is designed to provide grants to local projects in Garfield County for the benefit of wildlife and the county’s citizens.  Blue Mountain Community Foundation will invest and administer the fund.

The primary purpose of grants will be for stewardship—management, monitoring, restoration, enhancement, protection from degradation—of high-value habitat in Garfield County. Environmental mitigation for large construction projects traditionally involves a one-time investment, such as acquisition and preservation of an environmentally sensitive tract of land.   Never before had the Department of Fish and Wildlife seen mitigation take the form of a long-term endowment.

“During my tenure, this is the most novel and innovative approach to using mitigation funds,” said Mike Ritter, WDFW Mitigation Biologist.  “WDFW’s mission is to preserve, protect and perpetuate ecosystems.  With an endowment, we have created a way to conserve habitat for generations in Garfield County.”

“Blue Mountain Community Foundation is delighted about this fund for a couple of reasons,” noted Foundation Executive Director Lawson Knight.  “We say we serve Garfield County and this fund joins others that benefit Garfield County and demonstrate our commitment to serving the County.  Another reason is we invest for a Healthy Community, which includes the environment.  This is the most significant fund for the environment in the Foundation’s history.”

The Fund’s executive committee, composed of representatives from Puget Sound Energy, the Garfield County Board of Commissioners, and the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, is developing grant guidelines and will seek project proposals.  A project committee, including executive committee members along with a representative from a wildlife-oriented organization and an at-large member, will review grant requests and select recipients.

 ###

CONTACT:

  • Anne Walsh, Sr. Environmental/Communications Manager, PSE, (509) 382-2043
  • Grant Morgan, P.E., Director of Garfield County Public Works and County Engineer, (509) 843-1301
  • Mike Ritter, Wind Mitigation Biologist, WDFW, (509) 543-3319
  • Lawson Knight, Executive Director, Blue Mountain Community Foundation, (509) 529-4371

About Puget Sound Energy

Washington state’s oldest local energy utility, Puget Sound Energy serves 1.1 million electric customers and more than 750,000 natural gas customers in 11 counties.  A subsidiary of Puget Energy, PSE meets the energy needs of its customers, in part, through cost-effective energy efficiency, procurement of sustainable energy resources, and far-sighted investment in the energy-delivery infrastructure. PSE employees are dedicated to providing great customer service that is safe, dependable and efficient. For more information, visit www.PSE.com.

About Garfield County

Garfield County is located in southeastern Washington with the Snake River Canyon in places descending well over 1,000 feet to the river. The Oregon state line marks Garfield County’s southern border with elevations rising to the Blue Mountains.  Agriculture has dominated Garfield County’s economy with farms occupying two-thirds of the county. Wheat is the main crop, though other grains such as barley and bluegrass are also grown.  Now, the County has begun harvesting wind.  At 712.80 square miles which encompasses a portion of the Umatilla National Forest, Garfield County is the seventh-smallest county in the state.  As of 2000, the population is 2397, making it the least populous in the state.  The county seat is at Pomeroy, the county’s only city.

About Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife

Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife mission is to preserve, protect and perpetuate fish, wildlife and ecosystems while providing sustainable fish and wildlife recreational and commercial opportunities.  With six regional offices spread across Washington State, the Region 1 office (Spokane) is responsible for conservation and protection of native fish and wildlife in Eastern Washington State, including Garfield County as well as providing sustainable fishing, hunting and other wildlife-related recreational experiences.

About Blue Mountain Community Foundation

Since 1984, the Blue Mountain Community Foundation has served donors who care about Blue Mountain area communities, including Washington’s Garfield, Columbia and Garfield Counties, as well as the Northeast section of Umatilla County in Oregon.  Through this generosity, BMCF grants in excess of $1.6 Million each year.  It has grown to over $30M in assets in 250 component funds.  Several Foundation funds benefit Garfield County including the Lawrence and Margaret Slater Scholarship Fund for Pomeroy High School graduates and the Garfield County Health Foundation Fund.

Impacts to Giving if the Tax Code Changes

What follows is an analysis that Blue Mountain Community Foundation received from the Council on Foundations, which monitors Federal policy for us.  I encourage you to read it to understand the impact of reforms to the Charitable Deduction.

Council on Foundations Policy Update

Changes in Tax Code Could Significantly Impact Charitable Giving

Unlike other tax incentives-for buying a home, installing energy-efficient windows, or buying a fuel-efficient car-the charitable deduction is unique in that it rewards behavior that, by definition, provides no direct benefit to the individual. Whatever options are on the table for tax reform, the tax code should continue to encourage the selfless act of giving to charity.

In an ideal world, changes would both increase charitable giving and save the government money. A new study from the Congressional Budget Office (CBO), “Options for Changing the Tax Treatment of Charitable Giving,” examines 11 ways that changes in the tax code could impact individual charitable giving and evaluates what each would mean for federal tax revenue.

The CBO report found that:

  • Allowing all taxpayers (not just itemizers) to claim the charitable deduction would increase gifts to charity by an estimated $2 billion (1 percent) but would cost the government nearly $5.2 billion in tax revenue.
  • Replacing the current deduction with a 25 percent tax credit would also likely increase charitable donations but not as much as it would decrease government revenues. A similar proposal using a 15 percent credit instead of a 25 percent one would result in both decreased giving and decreased revenue-a clear nonstarter.
  • Keeping the deduction but allowing individuals to decrease their taxes only by the amount above a charitable threshold would increase both giving and federal tax revenue. For example, if individuals could deduct gifts to the extent they exceed $500, the CBO estimates that giving would rise by $800 million and the government would collect an additional $2.5 billion in taxes.

This last policy could be a win-win for deficit hawks and the philanthropic sector. However, key questions remain. For example, will it work? The CBO acknowledges that its study includes data that are five years old and therefore don’t reflect the current economic climate. The study also looks backwards, making assumptions about what revenue and giving would have been if these changes existed in the past.

This is particularly important as we predict the actions of high-income taxpayers. The top 13 percent of taxpayers account for almost 60 percent of all charitable gifts. Because so few give so much, even relatively minor changes in their giving could leave many charities even more cash-strapped than they already are. An upcoming study by The Center on Philanthropy at Indiana University (expected this fall) will take a closer look at precisely how high-net worth families are likely to respond to other proposed changes in tax policy. The Council, working on behalf of the philanthropic sector, is committed to ensuring any changes in the tax code enhance, not hurt, charitable giving.

For additional information regarding the CBO report, contact the Council’s senior policy analyst, Shelton Roulhac, at Shelton.Roulhac@cof.org or 703-879-0699.

A Responsive Community

Last Thursday, the Walla Walla Union-Bulletin ran a story, Agency needs helping hand of its own.  The story described the difficulty Helpline, a bedrock of Walla Walla’s social safety net, is having in its housing program.  The Housing program helps in a small way keep 18-20 families in their homes each month.

Normally, federal dollars are available to sustain the program.  With a federal budget debate raging, the help is not there at this time.  The result is Helpline is out of resources unless other contributions are made.

I was privileged last Friday to take a check for $7,000 from an anonymous donor to Helpline to sustain its program.

A cliche in business is see a need and fill it.  It is an apt description for our community, too.  One of the greatest quality-of-life assets that we enjoy is the generosity of our citizenry.

I will close with three thank yous:  Thank you to Helpline for helping those in need.  Thank you to Sheila Hagar and the Union-Bulletin for quality coverage of our community.  Thank you to the anonymous donor who saw a need and filled it.

Crying over Spilled Tea

Revelations in recent days about alleged abuses and fabrications by author and international nonprofit leader, Greg Mortenson, leave many crying over spilled milk tea.

Mortenson co-wrote the international bestseller, Three Cups of Tea, an autobiographical account of his escape from death on K2 and recovery in a remote Pakistani village.  Through his survival, Mortenson committed to building a village school, which he has now done over and over again in Pakistan and Afghanistan.  Much of the narrative is alleged to be fiction and has many outraged.  Add to the falsehoods, abuse of nonprofit status and quite a controversy is brewing.

So, what can nonprofit organizations learn from this debacle?  The Chronicle of Philanthropy editorial offers insight from which all of us can learn.  Their top tips:

  • Consider public expectations in every report and publication.
  • View the informational tax return as a public-disclosure document, not just an Internal Revenue Service form.
  • Watch for potential conflicts of interests involving top executives and board members.
  • Prevent sweetheart deals that benefit a charity’s officials or board members.
  • Structure the board to engender public trust.
  • Conduct independent audits regularly to avoid trouble.
  • Adopt clear and fair travel policies.
  • Draft an emergency-response plan long before any problems arise.

For fans of the Blue Mountain Community Foundation, we have all of these practices in place with the exception of clear and fair travel policies, mostly because we rarely travel.  What do you think nonprofit organizations should do to assure trustworthy stewardship?

Smaller government means larger role for local Nonprofit Organizations

Washington’s Governor Chris Gregoire released her proposed budget December 15, 2010.  In the opening Message from the Governor, she states:

The safety net will be stretched thin in some places and eliminated entirely in other places.  For the functions that government no longer will be able to provide, we must turn to neighbors, private charities, faith-based organizations and other local programs.  Our communities, more than ever, will be asked to step up.

Gov. Gregoire’s forecast is a reality the Foundation is already seeing in area communities.  With reductions or eliminations in cash and medical assistance from Department of Human and Social Services to expiration of long-term unemployment benefits, more people are looking for help from local charities.

So, what is the best way for our community to help people stay on their feet?  Comments welcome.